Volume 1, Issue 4

 

Contents

Main Page

 
 
 

HR and Corporate Governance
by Chris Bull and Rod McDermott

A number of high profile corporate failures in 2000-2003 have brought a renewed focus on the importance of good corporate governance, bringing the topic to a broader audience. As corporate governance issues become increasingly important, Human Resources management will play a pivotal role in the restoration of public confidence in business institutions.

In response to the Enron, WorldCom and other corporate governance and accounting scandals, U.S. President George Bush signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which sets forth new corporate governance, auditor, conflict of interest and disclosure requirements affecting issuers, management, employees, auditors, investment banks, boards and attorneys. This legislation has already affected and is likely to continue to impact further legislation, regulations and the activities of corporations around the world for years to come.

Examples abound of poor decisions regarding executive and director compensation plans. From obtaining interest-free loans from the company, to poaching retirement plans, to insider trading - business has been taking a beating. The current criminal trial of the Rigas family of Adelphia Communications for fraud is just one example of lack of governance. It could be argued that all board members of the company should take responsibility for the billions of dollars in potential damages to shareholders and employees.

Last year, shareholders at SBC Communications presented resolutions that required a link between executive compensation and performance. The board of directors blocked the resolutions. This year, an initiative is in place to connect the two, mainly due to the appointment of an independent board member as chairman of the Compensation Committee. This is a direct effect of Sarbanes-Oxley on corporate governance.

The human resources committee is often charged with oversight responsibility for executive and senior management performance and pay, adequacy and effectiveness of compensation plans, benefit plans, stock option plans and succession planning. How well this oversight is achieved has a large effect on the public's perception of the company as a whole.

The importance of this task is reflected in the increasing inclusion of human resources management reports in fiscal reporting. Now more than ever, analysts and the public are looking at compensation policies and executive benefits in a focused way.

Human resource leaders are facing a severe challenge - how to balance the need to protect the business and its stakeholders while retaining senior management and offering competitive compensation plans. By meeting this challenge, the human resources staff can craft the only source of sustainable competitive advantage-an organization whose design, culture, and people are aligned with its strategy and values.