Volume 1, Issue 2

 

Contents

Main Page

 
 
 

Corporate Governance: The New Appetite for Director Talent on the Public Company Board
By Chris Bull, Managing Director
McDermott & Bull Executive Search

It will not come as a surprise to most that have tracked the ongoing progress of corporate reform over the past year, the fact that public company board turnover has doubled in the same twelve month period. The perception of increased time, mandated expertise and personal risk has made the decision easy for some directors to decrease the number of boards they sit on or simply get out of the "director business" altogether. This reality has created a flurry of activity among nominating committees on boards as well as for the executive search firms who service them.

The calculated strategy that goes into the selection of new directors is a distant cousin to the strategy utilized in the past. Boards are looking for new members with energy, drive, tremendous intelligence and domain expertise in areas the company may want to penetrate in the future. Certain committee prerequisites make it necessary to identify individuals with a specific professional skill-set.

Make note, this short list of director "absolutes" is consistent with most all public company board nominating committees:

Public Company Board Experience- During this period of board scrutiny, existing directors are looking to add other seasoned directors that have served on public boards in the past. While not-for-profit boards and private company boards are excellent experience, these days it is often not enough to earn consideration as a candidate.

Availability of Time- Informal surveys estimate the time commitment of a board member will double to over 200 hours per year, starting this year. Certain committee members, most notably those on the audit committee, will undoubtedly need to dedicate many more hours to fulfill their responsibilities. Company boards are almost universally asking their senior executives to reduce their obligations to outside boards, making the hunt for financial talent intense. Thus, not surprisingly, the individuals in greatest demand for corporate-board duty are former audit partners and retired CFOs.

Check the Ego at the Door- The productivity of a board is often stymied by the egos of some of its board members. The majority of boards are made up of prominent business people and academics that have accomplished a great deal in their respective careers. Added attention is being given today to a director candidate's reputation and productivity in the boards they have served on in the past.

Corporate Governance Education- Many law firms and consulting firms are conducting extensive corporate governance conferences that bring individuals up to date on all of the latest reform taking place. It is certainly looked at positively that a director candidate has invested the time to become educated on what is an extremely complex series of reform items.

Risk- After all of the due diligence is completed on a company and its board, the D&O coverage is examined by outside legal counsel, and all the questions have been answered, can a director candidate be assured that his or her risk has been mitigated? Absolutely not! There will undoubtedly remain risk when taking on the role as a director of a public company board. The company should do everything in its power to minimize the personal exposure to its officers and directors. There exist new protection vehicles that a director candidate may want to investigate. At the end of the day, the individual must be willing and able to step up, do the job to the best of their ability, and know that a certain level of risk will exist with the role.

It is yet to be seen what net results will come out of the sweeping corporate reforms brought into effect in 2002 and into 2003. William Allen, Director of the New York University of Law and Business states, "We have to be realistic about what conscientious businesspeople can do working on a part-time basis." We have seen certain practices developed in the selection strategy to give a board the best opportunity to bring in those individuals that will perform at the highest level. The talent pool is deep, the interest level mixed. Those boards that are most proactive with their strategy will certainly walk away with the winners.

Chris Bull can be reached at Bull@mbsearch.net